ACBL World Computer Bridge Championship, VI
Montreal, August 23-28, 2002
Jack Retains Championship! One IMP decides the 64-board final.
by Al Levy
After five days of
computer-bridge competition, including a complete 20-board round robin (120
boards per contestant), a 48-board semifinal and a 64-board final, Jack nipped
WBridge5 by 1 IMP. The two
finalists had played a total of 232 boards sitting both East/West and
North/South...464 hands of bridge in all. It came down to the last board.
Board
64
Vul: E/W
North
(WBridge5)
¨
10
§
K 6 4 2
West (Jack)
East (Jack)
ª
K 6 2 ª
10 5
© 8 7 6 4
© A 10 9
¨
A 9 6 ¨
J 8 5 4
ª
J 8 7 3
¨
K Q 7 3 2
§
5 3
West North East
South
Pass 1§ Pass 1¨
Pass 1© Pass 1ª
Pass 2ª All Pass
Opening lead: § 7
WBridge5 did well to stop in 2ª and had to make 9 tricks to tie the match. While the programs had no idea of the state of the match, Hans Kuijf, developer of Jack, and Yves Costel, developer of WBridge5, along with their supporters and spectators, watched to see if the match would end in a tie. At the "other" table Jack had gone down one in 4ª when North took a more aggressive view. West led the §7. There are four obvious losers, 2 clubs, one heart and one diamond. If declarer could time the play correctly 9 tricks were possible on a crossruff. However, when Jack returned the ª10 at trick two declarer could not make more than eight tricks. In actual play, Wbridge5 played hearts first and diamonds second. Each defender, after winning their Ace, returned a trump and declarer was held to 8 tricks...and Jack was crowned the 2002 World Computer-Bridge Champion.
Jack versus WBridge5 in 64-board final:
Final |
1-16 |
17-32 |
33-48 |
49-64 |
Total |
Jack |
21 |
9 |
42 |
25 |
97 |
WBridge5 |
46 |
10 |
23 |
17 |
96 |
Round
Robin
Leading up to the semifinals and
finals, the 20-board round robin ended with Jack, WBridge5, MicroBridge and
Q-Plus Bridge taking the top four spots.
GIB would have qualified for the semifinals but chose to withdraw from
the tournament during the last round robin match because of technical
difficulties. The GIB
representative, Bart Massey, did not believe that the (network timing) problem
that GIB was experiencing could be fixed in the one day extension granted him
before he would have had to play the semifinal match.
Jack won the round robin by 13 VPs. Its only loss was to WBridge5 by 15 IMPs. WBridge5 did not lose a match. Both programs, along with GIB (before the technical problem) and MicroBridge had scored well.
20-Board Round Robin, 25-VP Scale (IMPs/VPs)
Team |
Jack |
WB5 |
MicroB |
Q-Plus |
BCB |
MB |
GIB |
Total |
|
Jack The
|
bye 15 |
28-43 12 |
69-42 21 |
81-17 25 |
58-33 20 |
78-41 25 |
45-41 16 |
134 |
1 |
WBridge5 France |
43-28 18 |
bye 15 |
75-60 18 |
61-58 16 |
51-32 19 |
64-40 20
|
46-45 15 |
121 |
2 |
MicroBridge Japan |
42-69 9 |
60-75 12 |
bye 15 |
40-31 17 |
46-18 21 |
96-13 25 |
46-41 16 |
115 |
3 |
Q-Plus BridgeGermany |
17-81 3 |
58-61 14 |
31-40 13 |
bye 15 |
77-14 25 |
115-30 25 |
21-75 4 |
99 |
4 |
Blue |
33-58 10 |
32-51 11 |
18-46 9 |
14-77 3 |
bye 15 |
75-19 25 |
22-83 3 |
76 |
5 |
Meadowlark USA |
16-78 3 |
40-64 10 |
13-96 0 |
30-115 0 |
19-75 4 |
bye 15 |
avg.+ 17 |
49 |
6 |
GIB USA |
41-45 14 |
45-46 15 |
41-46 14 |
75-21 25 |
83-22 25 |
w/d 0 |
bye 15 |
108 |
w/d |
Jack
and WBridge5 won their 48-board semifinal match convincingly to set up the
exciting final.
WBridge5 continued its streak of not losing any set of
boards.
Jack vs. Q-Plus
Bridge
Jack
+22
68
52
34
176
Q-Plus
Bridge
25
3
58
96
WBridge5 v2.3 vs.
MicroBridge
WBridge5
+6
94
39
76
215
MicroBridge
8 30
8 46
Round Robin: (from
left to right): Yumiko and Tomio Uchida, playing
MicroBridge, and Rodney Ludwig and David Walker, playing