Wbridge5 crowned 2016 champion, narrowly
defeating Micro Bridge
21st World
Computer-Bridge Championship, August 19-24, 2017
at the
WBF's 2017 43rd World Bridge Teams Championships, Lyon, France
20th Ourgame World
Computer-Bridge Championship
The 20th Ourgame World Computer-Bridge Championship was held
September 10-15, 2016 alongside the World Bridge Games in Wroclaw, Poland.
Eight robots competed for the title. For full results go to
results
French news articles on Wbridge5's win: Wbridge5
champion Newspaper
column by Jean-Pierre Desmoulins
http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/wroclaw.16/Microsite/bulletins/Bul_06.pdf
Issue 6, September 9,
page 15
Robots to vie for bridge championship
http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/wroclaw.16/Microsite/bulletins/Bul_08.pdf
Issue 8, September 11
Front Page Photo
bul_08http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/wroclaw.16/Microsite/bulletins/Bul_10.pdf
Issue 10. September 13, page 16 Micro
Bridge leads robot tournament by Al Levy
http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/wroclaw.16/Microsite/bulletins/Bul_12.pdf
Issue 12, September 15,
page 11
Robot Round Robin Round Up by Al Levy
http://www.worldbridge.org/repository/tourn/wroclaw.16/Microsite/bulletins/Bul_14.pdf
Issue 14, September 17, page 13
Bots battle to the last byte by Al
Levy
The Bridge World, August 2017, p.26.
The daily real-time
report
Day 1
The championship has started. We are in room 33 in Centennial Hall.
The round robin will be played over 4 days, with 2 matches today (9/10) and 1
tomorrow (starting at 17.00), 2 on 9/12 and 2 on 9/13. The 64-board KO
semifinals will be on 9/14 and the 64-board final on 9/15.
All 8 robots made it to Wroclaw. 16 computers are networked so that the
robots can pass information through a central table Manager, written by Gérard
Joyez.
I'll write every day with some news.
One of the strong favorites, and last year's champion, Jack, developed by
Hans Kuijf, is noticeably missing from this year's competition. Hans reports
that he, and his colleagues will return next year.
Welcome back after many years away, to past champion Meadowlark Bridge
developed by Rodney Ludwig.
Welcome to first time competitor, Xinru from China which promises to be a
strong competitor.
32-board Round Robin
First round: IMPs (VPs)
Bridge Baron 67 (12.05)
Xinrui 57 (7.95)
Shark Bridge 81 (13.12)
Q-Plus Bridge 65 (6.88)
Wbridge5 266 (20)
Meadowlark Bridge 14 (0)
Micro Bridge 94 (17.87)
RoboBridge 40 (2.13)
Second round: IMPs (VPs)
Wbridge5 76 (12.95)
Xinrui 61 (7.05)
Shark Bridge 91 (13.94)
Bridge Baron 71 (6.06)
RoboBridge 81 (19.11)
Meadowlark Bridge 11 (0.89)
Micro Bridge 53 (11.47)
Q-Plus Bridge 46 (8.53)
Full results will be posted daily at
https://allevybridge.com/allevy/computerbridge/2016scores.html
Day 2
Play today started at 17.00, the same as in the human competition.
See day 1 for the first 2 rounds.
The leader after three rounds is Micro Bridge (45.80 VPs) followed by
pre-tournament favorite Wbridge5 (38.71), followed by Q-Plus Bridge (35.11),
Bridge Baron (32.35), Xinrui (31.57), Shark Bridge (30.60), RoboBridge (24.67)
and Meadowlark Bridge (0.89)
With 3 rounds completed some guesses are in order. Meadowlark Bridge's robot
has not improved from its last appearance 12 years ago, and the relative showing
of the other robots shows the progress that has been made since then. New entry
Xinrui shows to be competitive, and too early to make any predictions on its
final standing. RoboBridge has to do much better if it is to make the final
four.
Day 3
Play started, as usual, with the Laws of Robot Bridge safely tucked
away in my wallet, hidden behind some Zloty. Then the unimaginable...an
insufficient bid !!!! The software sent an error message and play stopped. Not
to worry, I know Law 6 covers it..."when Laws 1-5 do not specify a remedy, the
Director provides one". Skip the board and assess a 3 Imps penalty. A
spectator was overheard saying, I guess they're only human.
More on this...maybe...as the guilty party is busy checking his 10,000
lines of code.
That would be an interesting ploy, to settle for a 3 Imp loss on a calculated
expectation of losing more than 3 IMPs, as might occur if there is a known
bidding misunderstanding (near impossible in perfectly programmed robot
play, but who is to say that AI couldn't give the robots a life of their own).
The day ended with 5 rounds in the bank, and two to go.
Micro Bridge (Japan) 75.15
Wbridge5 (France) 70.54
Q-Plus Bridge (Germany) 56.54
Xinrui (China) 56.46
Shark Bridge (Denmark) 55.78
Bridge Baron (USA) 52.86
RoboBridge (The Netherlands) 31.78
Meadowlark Bridge (USA) 0.89
Micro Bridge is leading after 5 rounds, with Wbridge5 close behind. Both
have 2 matches to play against contenders but the betting odds favor them both
reaching the semifinal stage. Following closely together in the standing are
four contenders vying for the other two qualifying positions, Q-Plus Bridge,
Xinrui, Shark Bridge and Bridge Baron. RoboBridge is mathematically out of the
running and Meadowlark Bridge is in it for the practice.
Day 4, 6th round
Qualifying day, with Wbridge5 and Micro Bridge sure to qualify for the
semifinal KO. Four other bots will battle for the remaining 2 spots, with 4
(Bridge Baron, Xinrui, Q-Plus Bridge and Shark Bridge) within 4 VPs of each
other going into round 6.
After the sixth round:
Wbridge5 (France) 83.14
Micro Bridge (Japan) 78.80
Xinrui (China) 76.46
Bridge Baron (USA) 69.21
Q-Plus Bridge (Germany)63.94
Shark Bridge (Denmark) 62.,16
RoboBridge (The Netherlands) 45.40
Meadowlark Bridge (USA) 0.89
With Bridge Baron expected to take 20 VPs against Meadowlark Bridge, it is
guaranteed a place in the semifinal stage, finishing 3rd or 2nd. Shark Bridge
needs a 47 Imp victory against Xinrui to overtake Xinrui and a possible place in
the top 4, and Q-Plus Bridge could also finish in the top four with a win of at
least 37 Imps over RoboBridge.
Day 4: End of Round
Robin
In the final round, with Bridge Baron taking 20 VPs
against Meadowlark Bridge and Micro Bridge narrowly defeating Wbridge5, the top
three qualifiers were guaranteed (Wbridge5, Micro Bridge and Bridge Baron). The
Xinrui - Shark Bridge and Q-Plus Bridge - RoboBridge matches would determine the
last qualifying position. Xinrui started the round 14.3 VPs ahead of Shark
Bridge and 12.5 VPs ahead of Q-Plus Bridge. Q-Plus Bridge needed to win by at
least 37 IMPs to have a chance, and was up by 37 IMPs with one board remaining,
but RoboBridge made 3NT on the last board to win 5 IMPs and end Q-Plus Bridge’s
chances of qualifying. In the other match, Shark Bridge did win by 55 IMPs, in
large part due to board 10, and qualified fourth.
Board 10
Dlr: E
Vul: Both
.
. |
North
♠ T876
♥ T743
♦ 84
♣ 932 |
|
West
♠ --
♥ KQ92
♦ KT73
♣ AQ854 |
|
East
♠ QJ
♥ J865
♦ AJ92
♣ KJT |
|
South
♠ AK95432
♥ A
♦ Q65
♣ 76 |
|
West
Xinrui
.
6♦ |
North
Shark Bridge
.
All Pass |
East
Xinrui
1♦
. |
South
Shark Bridge
4♠
. |
Opening lead ♠A
Declarer misguessed the ♦Q,
playing South for short diamonds, down 1 -100.
West
Shark Bridge
1♥
Dbl
4NT
6♥
All Pass |
North
Xinrui
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
. |
East
Shark Bridge
1♦
2♥
5♣1
Pass
. |
South
Xinrui
1♠
4♠
Pass
Dbl
. |
1 1 keycard
The lead of the ♠A, ruffed in dummy, was followed by the
♥K. The ♥Q
was cashed revealing the trump break. A trump coup is needed to make the
contract, and requires North to hold at least three clubs and at least two
diamonds. Shark Bridge now cashed three rounds of clubs. Declarer, playing
South to have the diamond queen, cashed the diamond ace and a low diamond to the
ten! Now running the clubs produced a trump coup.
+1660, and 18 Imps to Shark Bridge.
Note that two rounds of diamonds must be played before running the clubs as
North will discard a diamond on the fourth club.
Final Round Robin Standing:
Q Wbridge5 (France) 91.87
Q Micro Bridge (Japan) 90.07
Q Bridge Baron (USA) 89.21
Q Shark Bridge (Denmark) 80.12
Q-Plus Bridge (Germany) 78.76
Xinrui (China) 78.50
RoboBridge (The Netherlands) 50.58
Meadowlark Bridge (USA) 0.89
Day 5: Semifinals
Both semifinal matches were extremely close, with Wbridge5 (France) defeating
Shark Bridge (Denmark) by the margin of the carryover, and Micro Bridge (japan)
defeating Bridge Baron (USA) by 6 Imps.
Wbridge5 (9.6) 35 33 27 36 140.6
Shark Bridge 22 63 19 27 131
Micro Bridge 26 4 55 59 144
Bridge Baron 41 57 16 24 138
One of the best declarer played deals of the robot championship occurred
early in the semifinal match, and was more than the margin of victory in both
matches.
Board 4
Dlr: W
Vul: None
.
. |
North
♠ 532
♥ AQJ4
♦ Q3
♣ A653 |
|
West
♠ AQ6
♥ K8732
♦ T
♣ QJ84 |
|
East
♠ JT984
♥ T5
♦ J74
♣ KT7 |
|
South
♠ K7
♥ 96
♦ AK98652
♣ 92 |
|
West
Shark Bridge
1♥
2♠
Pass
Pass |
North
Wbridge5
Pass
Dbl1
4NT
6♦ |
East
Shark Bridge
1♠
Pass
Pass
All Pass |
South
Wbridge5
2♦
3♥2
5♦3
. |
1 strength with 4+ clubs
2 spade stopper, looking for heart stopper for NT
3 1 ace
Opening lead ♣Q
With West long in hearts, without the club king, therefore the spade ace, a
heart-spade squeeze without the count is the marked play. For success diamonds
must be 2-2 or 3-1 with a stiff honor with West as declarer needs two entries to
hand, one to take one heart finesse and one to run the diamonds. Diamond queen
overtaken with the ace caters to both possibilities. The play proceeds: club
ace; diamond queen overtaken with the ace; heart finesse, diamond finesse
(restricted choice); running diamonds and on the last diamond West had no safe
discard.
. |
North
♠ 53
♥ AQ4
♦ --
♣ -- |
|
West
♠ AQ
♥ K87
♦ --
♣ -- |
|
East
♠ JT
♥ T
♦ --
♣ KT |
|
South
♠ K7
♥ 9
♦ 2
♣ 9 |
|
At the table West discarded the ♠Q, declarer led a spade to West's stiff ace
and West had to return a heart, +1370 and 15 Imps as Shark Bridge was in 3♦ for
+150.
In the Micro Bridge versus Bridge Baron match, Bridge Baron was in 3♦ +130
and Wbridge5 was in 5♦ +620.
The opening lead against 5♦ was
a low heart, finessed, and on the run of diamonds West was similarly squeezed.
Note that the play must be the same to make 5♦ or
6♦. This deal is from the
quarter-finals of the team championships (Open, Women's, Senior, Mixed) . Of the
32 times this deal was played by 'humans' the contracts were: 3NT by South (16);
3NT by North, down (3); 3♦ (7);
3♠ by East (2); 5♦,
down (2), making with an overtrick (1); and 6♦ (1)
making. The declareres that made 5♦ and
6♦ received the spade ace
lead, so their play was not tested. The two other declarers in 5♦ received
less friendly leads, and did not find the best play.
With two boards to play, and both matches almost even, the drop of a
singleton king offside would decide both matches.
Board 63
Dlr: S
Vul: E-W
.
. |
North
♠ JT43
♥ AQT98
♦ AKQ
♣ A |
|
West
♠ AQ872
♥ 732
♦ J43
♣ K5 |
|
East
♠ 5
♥ K5
♦ T8765
♣ T8632 |
|
South
♠ K96
♥ J64
♦ 92
♣ QJ974 |
|
West
Shark Bridge
.
Pass
3♦
All Pass |
North
Wbridge5
.
2♣
3♥
. |
East
Shark Bridge
.
2NT
Pass
. |
South
Wbridge5
Pass
Pass
4♥
. |
West plays ♠Q, ♠A, ♠7 for East to ruff, and East returned a club, West
playing the King. With West a passed hand, East was marked for the heart king,
and East was likely 1-2-5-5, so Wbridge5 got it right and dropped the stiff
♥K. No blood as 4♥
was also made by Shark Bridge, but a needed play by Wbridge5 to win the
match.Opening lead ♠5.
In the other semifinal match, at one table Bridge Baron reached 4♥
with no opposing bidding. The ♠5 was led, and after the ♠Q, ♠A and ruff by
East, a diamond was returned. Bridge Baron, not locating the ♣K, ruffed the 3rd
diamond and took the heart finesse for down one and the difference in the match.
At the other table Micro Bridge was in safer 3NT, making 4.
This deal was also played in the team championships round of 16. Of the 64
times the deal was played by humans, the contract was 4♥
N 52 times. 3NT was played 7 times and made 9 or 10 tricks. Of the 49
times the singleton spade was led against 4♥ declarer
made the contract 20 times. If declarer could find the ♣K with West, then East
would be marked with the ♥K. One clue
that a human declarer would have is the signal West gave when returning the 3rd
spade. It seems that West might signal for a club return knowing that a diamond
return could be fatal if partner led away from an honor. So deciding on stiff
♥K with East against the ♥K
with West is an interesting study.
Day 6:
Finals
Wbridge5 (France) defeated Micro Bridge (Japan) in the final KO for the 2016
bridge robot crown.
Wbridge5 61 16 26 59 162
Micro Bridge 26 40 58 32 156
With two boards to go Micro Bridge was up 17 Imps.
Board 63
Dlr: S
Vul: N-S
.
. |
North
♠ --
♥ AT62
♦ 9542
♣ KQ863 |
|
West
♠ J64
♥ Q8
♦ AT76
♣ AJ94 |
|
East
♠ KT9852
♥ J53
♦ K3
♣ T2 |
|
South
♠ AQ73
♥ K974
♦ QJ8
♣ 75 |
|
At one table Micro Bridge went down one in 3♣-N, for -100. At the other
table,
West
Micro Bridge
.
Pass
3♠ |
North
Wbridge5
.
1♥
4♥ |
East
Micro Bridge
.
2 ♠
All Pass |
South
Wbridge5
1♦
3♥
. |
Opening lead ♣10. E-W cashed their 3 outside winners, ♣A,
♦A,
♦K. While this was not the best
order of winning the 3 outside winners, it appeared that there was still a trump
loser for down one, and the end of any chance of Wbridge5 coming back.
Appearances are deceiving as Wbridge5 now executed perfectly to make the
contract: winning the club return; pitching the
♦Q on the remaining high club;
ruffing a club; ruffing a spade; ruffing a diamond; cashing the
♠A;
ruffing a spade; returning the ♦9
and overruffing East's ♥J with the
♥K; and finessed West's
♥Q. +620 and 12 Imps.
On the last board, with Micro Bridge up by 5 Imps:
Board 64
Dlr: W
Vul: E-W
.
. |
North
♠ QJT9763
♥ Q5
♦ Q4
♣ J5 |
|
West
♠ K
♥ K2
♦ A762
♣ K97642 |
|
East
♠ A852
♥ JT87
♦ 985
♣ A8 |
|
South
♠ 4
♥ A9643
♦ KJT3
♣ QT3 |
|
West
Wbridge5
1♣
.
Micro Bridge
1♣ |
North
Micro Bridge
3♠
.
Wbridge5
3♠ |
East
Wbridge5
3NT
.
Micro Bridge
All Pass |
South
Micro Bridge
All Pass
.
Wbridge5
. |
At one table, Micro Bridge went down 2 in 3♠, for -100. Against 3NT by
Wbridge5, as the cards lie, a diamond opening lead or return when N-S first gets
in is needed to defeat 3NT. The spade lead was won by the king and a club was
ducked to South. This is the best play for Wbridge5, setting up the club suit,
assuming a 3-2 break, retaining an entry to cash the spade ace, and leaving the
location of the ♣A in question.
South, in with the club ten, had one last chance to return a diamond, but
returned a low heart, which would have been right if declarer had the diamond
queen, and declarer misguesses the heart situation. Declarer went up with the
king and now had 9 tricks and the title.
Checking with Micro Bridge (yes, it is possible to ask the robots what they
were 'thinking.' North's 3♠ bid showed a 7-card suit and 5 or more playing
tricks. Micro Bridge interpreted the 3NT bid as showing a spade stopper and
a minimum of 8 hcp. North did not play spade ace at trick one, so South plays
East for the ace. Micro Bridge assumes QJ10xxxx as 5 playing tricks, but
QJ9xxxx as 4.5 playing tricks. Simulations gave the ace of club to North to
fulfill 5 playing tricks more often than QJ10xxxx. Here is a typical generated
hand .
North
♠ QJ97632
♥ JT5
♦ 8
♣ A5
A heart return at trick 3 will defeat the contract while a diamond lead will
allow a make (The reader is left to work out the end position).
Jack (The Netherlands), the pre-tournament co-favorite, was absent, but will
return next year. Newcomer Xinrui (China) proved to be a strong contender, just
missing the semifinal stage.
Congratulations to Wbridge5 for a very well played victory and to Micro
Bridge for a good battle down to the wire. Kudos to all the contestants for
their dedication to advancing robot play and, for many, developing robot
software for teaching, play and entertainment.. Much thanks to the ACBL,
WBF and this year’s sponsor, Ourgame, for all their support. A big thank
you to the Polish Bridge Union , notably Marek Malysa, for all their support,
and for making us feel at home, to Hans van Staveren for his technical support,
and to Ron Tacchi, Jean-Paul Meyer, Brent Manley and Mario Chavarria for their
fine coverage of the robot championship.