Robot play does have a human side…
by Al Levy
Shark Bridge took the title at the 18th World
Computer Bridge Championship was held in Sanya, China, part of the 14th
World Bridge Series. This year’s
competitors were three-time world champion WBridge5 (France), Shark Bridge
(Denmark), Micro Bridge (Japan), Bridge Baron (USA) and RoboBridge (The
Netherlands). Defending champion
Jack (The Netherlands) took this year off but is looking forward to competing
next year, at the Chicago summer NABC.
Year after year the best robots continues to improve.
You can see their progress as well as the 18 year history at the official
website, robot.allevybridge.com.
The improvement in play has created more and more interest in robot play as a
form of competition, that is, with all the human competitors sitting South, all
playing with the same robot partner and against the same robot opponents.
There are a number of excellent websites that have robot competition, and
analyze your game at the same time.
Isn’t technology wonderf ! The top two finishers of the round robin, Micro
Bridge (56 5 VPs) and Shark Bridge (53), faced off in a 64-board final match,
with WBridge5 (47.5), Bridge Baron (26) and RoboBridge (17) sidelined, but with
their developers as interested bystanders as seen below.
In front, left to right, are John Norris (Shark
Bridge) and Tomio Uchida (Micro Bridge) watching their robots compete in the
final KO, and in the back are Job Scheffers (RoboBridge), Stephen Smith (Bridge
Baron) and Yves Costel (WBridge5) watching the play.
In the 48-board round robin Shark Bridge had a big win against WBridge5 to advance to the final KO, in part due the following deal.
Board 11 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WBridge5 |
Shark Bridge |
WBridge5 |
Shark Bridge |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT1 |
3 ♦ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 ♥ |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dbl |
All Pass |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 2NT invitational (2S would ask for a spade stopper for 3NT) |
West |
North |
East |
South |
Shark Bridge |
WBridge5 |
Shark Bridge |
WBridge5 |
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Dbl |
All Pass |
|
|
|
♠8
The jump to 4♥
put pressure on South, which bid 4♠
and then doubled 5♥.
Shark Bridge +650 an 17 IMPs
With three boards to play in the final KO, Micro Bridge led
by 5 IMPs. John Norris, developer
of Shark Bridge could see that the last two boards would be flat so the only
hope for victory lie in bidding and making a slam on board 62.
Tomio Uchida, developer of Micro Bridge was hoping for Shark Bridge to
stay below slam as Micro Bridge had bid to 5♥
and made 450 on a club lead at the other table.
Board 62 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West |
North |
East |
South |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Micro Bridge |
Shark Bridge |
Micro Bridge |
Shark Bridge |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 NT1 |
4 ♣ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Pass |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 spades and clubs |
The slam is quite good and is only defeated with a diamond
lead as there are limited entries to ruff two clubs and pull trump.
On a club lead, the slam makes if declarer plays
♥A and noting the drop of the
♥10, ruffs one club with the
♥Q and finesses the jack to pull trump, a good prospect on the auction
and restricted choice. East led the
♠A and the title went to Shark Bridge.